🔗 Share this article

Australia's controversial move to prohibit social networking access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are observing with great interest to see if this tactic will inspire imitation for other nations.

Across Europe Movement

Throughout Europe, a growing chorus of countries are considering comparable measures.

• Denmark has announced a prohibition on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister stating that smartphones and networks are "robbing our kids' innocence". The policy could be passed soon.
• Norway is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, pointing to the need to shield the young from the "power of the AI".
• The Irish government is introducing a digital ID system to verify the identity and age of social media participants. The media minister have indicated that an similar ban remains "one of the options on the table".
• In Spain, the leader has called on the legislature to pass a bill lifting the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the head of state has floated the idea of a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, including an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged parents to prevent their kids from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the EU parliament has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for minors without parental consent is given. Even though it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these apps, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a useful first step," commented one European lawmaker driving the initiative.

Britain: A Watchful Stance

For the United Kingdom, the administration has kept open a potential ban, emphasizing that "no option is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in strong research".

Previously, interest gathered behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately watered down. Instead, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Advocacy groups have voiced warnings. A prominent charity founded by the relatives of a young person who died after being exposed to dangerous social media material suggests that a blanket age ban might not make platforms safer and could result in a "dangerous transition" of harm when users become eligible.

"This ban is a reaction to the inability of the social media companies to build tools that are safe and age appropriate for young users," stated a prominent child protection advocate.

The United States: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, regulation is primarily unfolding at the regional level amid federal stalemate.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for under-18s to use social media and limits nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has signed a bill prohibiting those below 14 from creating accounts on social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has approved a rule limiting teenagers to one hour of social media use per day, with any further time requiring parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and The state of Louisiana have similarly passed measures demanding guardian approval for teenagers to create social media accounts.

Despite bipartisan support and suggestions from some politicians to mimic the Australian example, a US-wide ban is currently seen as unlikely.

Worldwide Perspectives

Apart from Europe and the US, further states are likewise exploring options.

• Malaysia plans to prohibit social media for under-16s effective next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has raised the required age for Instagram to 16.

But, world organizations adopt a more nuanced position. The UN children's agency has advised that age-based restrictions have downsides and "could have unintended consequences". The organization highlights that the internet can be a "lifeline" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "substitute" for platform operators to invest in user protection.

As this worldwide debate unfolds, the actions of this nation and others demonstrate that governments globally are increasingly willing to stand by for the industry to act voluntarily.